washing machine

5 of the Biggest Greenwashing Scandals in the World

Our planet is experiencing rapid climate change due to a range of reasons. Many people argue that climate change is natural.

However, researchers have proven that human activities have accelerated global warming.

The leading cause behind global warming is the release of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

Most of us know that the real culprit behind the release of greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere is none other than the  CO2- intensive industries.

Famous companies tend to hide how their activities are polluting the planet. The trend of greenwashing has been circling for quite some time. It is a lie that could cause severe consequences.

So, let’s discuss some famous Greenwashing scandals that came to light recently.

Understanding such scandals will help you question what you see and separate the wheat from the chaff when it comes to sustainability claims.


Shell Called Out For Exaggerating Its Green Activities


Shell's recent ad campaign in the UK entered analysis for its deceptive representation of the business's ecological initiatives.

In a collection of adverts, Shell repainted itself as a leader in the shift to cleaner power, highlighting campaigns such as setting up electrical vehicle billing factors, creating overseas wind ranches, and providing eco-friendly electrical power.

Nonetheless, these advertisements easily left out Shell's critical tasks in oil and gas removal, which are significant factors in greenhouse gas exhausts.

The UK's Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) ruled that these promotions were deceptive since they developed the perception that Shell's service was largely concentrated on lower-carbon power.

Most of Shell's procedures are still greatly based on nonrenewable fuel sources, which have sustained its astonishing carbon impact.

Shell's ecological influence is reflected in its carbon exhausts in 2022, which totaled up to a shocking 1.2 billion tonnes of greenhouse gasses.

Shell would be the fifth-largest carbon emitter internationally if it were a nation. The company faced reputational damage and the advertisement was banned. In 2023, the Shell directors were also sued over flawed climate strategy.


Incorrect Claim of FIFA As Carbon-Neutral World Cup

boykott Quatar world cup poster

For several years preceding the occasion, FIFA happily stated that the 2022 World Cup would certainly be the first carbon-neutral event in its history.

The host country, Qatar, supported these views, boasting its dedication to sustainability and ecological obligation.

Yet when the dirt worked out, coupled with the numbers, it was evaluated that these cases differed greatly from reality.

An examination right into the carbon impact of the World Cup disclosed a surprising truth: the competition was accountable for a surprising 3.6 million tonnes of CO2 discharges, making it one of the most polluting World Cups ever.

Companies in several nations, such as the UK, Belgium, France, the Netherlands, and Switzerland, raised issues over FIFA's deceptive declarations.

These issues triggered an examination by the Swiss Fairness Commission, an independent body entrusted with making certain standards for fairness in organization methods.

In June 2023, the investigation was carried out for all five complaints which were issued by participating countries.

FIFA failed to prove that the World Cup was carbon neutral. It fell short of proof that it had balanced out all carbon discharges.


HSBC Funded Fossil Fuels

HSBC tower

Among the globe's biggest financial organizations, HSBC made headlines for all the incorrect factors when it disclosed that regardless of its vibrant promise to accomplish net-zero carbon discharges by 2050, the financial institution continued to fund nonrenewable sources of fuel.

This plain opposition between words and activities gained HSBC an online reputation as a prime example of greenwashing.

According to examinations by The Guardian, HSBC authorized 58 shocking deals to nonrenewable fuel source developing and completing incredible $12 billion in funding after making its net-zero dedication.

These financial investments directly contradicted the financial institution's dedication to decreasing its carbon impact and transitioning to renewable resources.

HSBC encountered objections to its deceptive marketing methods along with its monetary connections to nonrenewable fuel sources.

The financial institution ran promotions at bus stops, highlighting its eco-friendly mission such as funding tasks to aid in the shift to net zero and sustaining tree-growing campaigns to confine carbon discharges.

Nevertheless, these advertisements easily left out HSBC's substantial function in adding to carbon discharges via its funding of nonrenewable fuel sources. The advertisements were banned by ASA.


Petronas Oil and Gas

Oil field

The Malaysian government-owned oil and gas titan Petronas was in a problem after trying to greenwash its substantial nonrenewable fuel source tasks via a deceptive promotion.

The advert, including a kid's voiceover, intended to stimulate compassion while providing Petronas as a forward-thinking power firm devoted to a lasting future. Nonetheless, the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) stepped in, prohibiting the advertisement for its deceptive messaging.

In the promotion, Petronas recognized the ecological effects of power manufacturing; however, it represented itself as a "modern power plus remedies companion" devoted to improving lives for a lasting future.

This picture nevertheless passed over the plain truth of Petronas' substantial contributions to greenhouse gas emissions.

According to Petronas' record, the firm was in charge of a shocking 49.5 million tonnes of greenhouse gas exhaust in 2022 alone.

This plain variation between Petronas' ecological influence and its representation in the promotion caused the ASA to take action and their advertisements were banned.


Innocent Drinks

Innocent smoothie in supermarket

In 2022, Innocent Drinks was under analysis for its insincere effort at predicting an eco-friendly picture with TV promotions. The firm owned by drink titan Coca-Cola encountered objection for its misleading depiction of ecological guardianship, which eventually gained it a spot in the greenwashing hall of pity.

Plastic Rebellion, an activist team committed to combating plastic contamination, fasted to call out Innocent for its inappropriate advertising and marketing strategies.

Regardless of Innocent's organization with Coca-Cola, among the globe's biggest plastic polluters, the firm tried to represent itself as an eco-mindful brand name with captivating television anime advertisements.

These promotions included lovable pets' vocal singing tracks concerning reusing and conserving the earth to create a link between the Innocent brand name and ecological reasons.

Nevertheless, this effort at greenwashing landed on its face as it starkly contrasted with the business's presumed use of single-use plastic product packaging, due to which the company lost it’s trust among the consumers. However, the company did not received any fine.


True Sustainability Pays Off

Some of the biggest entities in the world have been caught for greenwashing. These companies want to appear eco-friendly in front of their consumers.

However, through greenwashing, they lose their customers' trust.

It is time that businesses realize that adopting authentic, sustainable practices and avoid greenwashing pays off.

More and more consumers are waking up to these unethical practices and are choosing true sustainability. 


We hope you enjoyed this article. If you want to read more like this, make sure to check out our Blog and follow us on Instagram. If you are interested in truly sustainable products, check out our Shop

What are your thoughts about these Greenwashing scandals? Leave a comment below and engage in the discussion!





Back to blog

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.